I’ve kept slightly detached from some of the discussions
around curriculum that I’ve seen on blogs and CPD sessions in the last 18
months or so. This is partly because I’ve found it slightly too abstract and
also that teaching Economics, I don’t have pupils for as long as most subjects
so cannot devise a y 7-11 curriculum and have far less choice about what to
teach.
Having said that, I have recently read Kat Howard and Claire Hill’s book ‘Symbiosis’ and 'Gallimaufray to Coherence' by Mary Myatt which has inspired me to rethink how I consider the curriculum. In particular for KS4. My school start key stage 4 in year 9 so I have pupils for 3 years for their Economics GCSE.
Previously I have worked sequentially through the specification
but pupils ‘symbiosis’ has got me thinking about what the golden threads are
that link the subject together and what the big ideas are that I want pupils to
consider and how they can build on this through their 3 years of study.
Before I did this, I wrote every topic in the specification
out and on a piece of paper linked together where they relate to one another. For
example, scarcity links clearly to opportunity cost and price, but also to efficiency
and producer aims.
I don’t have as much freedom as some subjects in choosing
what to teach but by finding the common links a key narrative became apparent.
For me, the joy of economics is questioning how do we
allocate resources and what role the government have in creating the economy we
want for our society.
So pupils need to understand why resources are scarce (what
we call the economic problem). Then they need to build on that by understanding
how markets seek to allocate resources through the price mechanism so it seems
logical to then teach this. Following on from this, it was important to
understand why markets do not always operate efficiently. Once this is
established it is logical to understand the potential role of government. Then
to bring these topics together and to consider the economy from a different
perspective I want pupils to consider the impact the market and government intervention
have on workers.
I chose to frame this through several key questions I want
pupils to answer. Underneath each topic, I have considered the specific
knowledge and terminology that I want pupils to understand so they have a deep
understanding of each component part to answering these questions, as seen
below.
This is where I had to consider pre-requisite knowledge which took me away from traditional exam spec sequencing. For example, rather than looking at firms profitability as a separate topic in future years I introduce this when looking at the price mechanism as this makes understanding supply much easier and means when it is revisited in later years there is already some knowledge on the topic that can be activated.
What is important is that this is an evolution towards
getting to an end goal of understanding the best way that to allocate resources
in an economy. Given this, I then explicitly mapped what the links are between
topics so I can ask pupils the similarities and differences between these
topics. This is partly to force pupils to think deeply about the topics but
also so that they understand how topics link together to make sure we can use
economic models to understand the world.
I have explained the exact links that I want to explicitly teach below:
Then I wanted to look at different types of knowledge that Kat and Claire discuss. So I want to consider where they are opportunities to bring in hinterland knowledge to help bring the core knowledge to life. I found this tricky as on the one hand we are always considering how to limit extraneous load and now I am adding things that pupils do not need to remember. What I have tried to do in the main is to place economic theories into a historical context so they can understand the story of economic thought and how it has developed over time.
Similarly, with regards to procedural knowledge I have
started to consider what practical steps I need to teach, specifically in terms
of how to show changes in an equilibrium price on a diagram and develop a clear
chain of reasoning for different economic agents.
A final part that I had not considered before was the disciplinary
knowledge or how economists pursue truth. I don’t think I have thought this
through fully yet and I am looking forward to discussing in department meetings
with my team but I have thought about some of the concepts and constraints that
I want pupils to understand, especially the challenges of experiments in a
social science, the struggle of implementing ceterus paribus and how the
insights into behavioural economics and growing concerns about environmental sustainability
mean that we may need to rethink our economic models so they remain relevant.
Then into year 10, the overarching aim is the same but now
we broaden it out so look at the whole national economy rather than individual
firms and consumers. So pupils look at the role of business and financial
institutions before looking at what the government want out of an economy and
how it can be achieved.
At this point, we start to consider the debates in the
subject and to what extent environmental concerns force economists to rethink a
focus on traditional targets like economic growth.
Also, the key threshold concepts return so pupils must keep applying these to different contexts. So early on in year 9 pupils learned about demand in the context of scarcity. They then applied it to the price mechanism and later to labour markets Now in year 10 they look at aggregate demand for the whole economy before seeing how this can change with fiscal policy. So, the same core concept is explored 4 different times in 4 different contexts as it is a foundational tool used to analyse so many of the world’s problems.
Finally, in year 11 pupils then broaden this even further to
look at international economics and how these same questions about how the
market can allocate resources can be looked at to understand why countries are
rich, if trade and globalisation benefits all and why free trade is so
contentious an issue.
This is still a work in progress. I want this to form the basis
for discussions about the subject within my team and also to think about the work
pupils will produce and how they will be assessed to understand if they are
progressing through the curriculum.
If anyone economics teachers want to see the document that I’ve
made a few screenshots of then please let me know. I should say I made this to
help formulate my own thinking, not to fit some generic template as it’s really
not about shoehorning thoughts into a spreadsheet to tick a box!