Skip to main content

How do you make pupils think deeply?


If learning is a change in long term learning, then planning time should be devoted to ensuring this change. In order for this change to take place first pupils need clear explanations, then they need to think deeply about a concept for it to enter their long term memory and then there needs to be regular retrieval to ensure it stays in their long term memory.




I recently read a book by Peps Mccrea where he distinguished between the durability of knowledge in long term memory (how long is stays there) with the depth of that knowledge (how much pupils think about and understand that knowledge) and this was encapsulated by Daniel Willingham’s quote that ‘memoryis the residue of thought.’

It seems logical, we remember what we really think about. I read a bit on Albanian history last summer before I went there but I didn’t think particularly deeply about it and so do not remember much of it, whereas a misspent childhood analysing Arctic Monkeys lyrics mean I both deeply thought and remember every word to every magical song!

The problem that I found though was to understand what deep thought actually looks like. 

There has been a lot of excellent work on effective instruction (using examples and no-examples, dual coding and going from concrete to abstract that I recently blogged about) and a lot on how to use concepts like retrieval, spacing and interleaving to strengthen memory but there seems to be less on how to get pupils to actually think deeply.

If memory is the residue of thought, how do you plan to ensure your pupils think deeply? What follows are lessons from my painstaking trial and error approach over the last 2 years.

Deep thinking is not critical thinking by another name

When I first started teaching, I was introduced to the idea of a ‘business mindset’ and the idea that there were skills like making balanced judgements and evaluating decisions were the skills we want our pupils to emulate.

Whilst that is a long-term aim, I made the mistake of confusing this with deep thinking. When teaching about the economic impacts of introducing a minimum wage for example, to get pupils thinking deeply about the topic I would ask pupils to evaluate if the UK was right to introduce a minimum wage to develop this ‘higher order’ thinking.

It’s something I see in all my early teaching resources and so many shared resources that I see.
Daniel Willingham explains in detail why critical thinking skills are not generic and can only be developed by having an extensive domain-specific knowledge that pupils can draw upon from their long term memory when making decisions so if I want pupils to evaluate the impact of the minimum wage they need to fluently understand what a minimum wage, the impacts it has on an economy and in which circumstances these impacts are most acute.

So I need my pupils to think deeply about the knowledge I have taught them for them to remember it, not to take their shaky knowledge and use it to solve a problem.

Answer lots of questions!

Given the limitations of working memory, for them to think deeply all they should be doing is thinking about the concept. I would sometimes get pupils to make mind maps of what they had learned. Whilst there might be some merit in organising knowledge, pupils devoted most of their effort to make the mind map look aesthetically pleasing and the thinking of the actual concept was limited.

Mark Enser wrote in his book about an example where he asked pupils to make a newspaper front page about the impact of a tsunami and how the layout of the newspaper occupied most of their thinking capacity rather than considering the tsunami. I’ve tried something similar asking pupils to create a powerpoint presentation with similar results.

There are 2 things I have learnt from this. Firstly, is that the best way to focus their thinking on content is on questions. I ask pupils to answer lots and lots of questions on a concept, so they are practicing and only thinking about that concept and nothing else.

Secondly, the format is standardised. Pupils have a booklet of questions and every lesson follows the same format. Pupils know the routine and so they are not thinking at all about what they have to do (reducing the extraneous load) and purely on the content.

But this still does not answer our question. They might only be focussing on the learning, but what is that learning? What questions do I ask to encourage critical thinking?

There are 3 areas that I focus on to encourage deep thinking.

Consequences of chains of reasoning

The first is the impact of this on other factors. In Economics everything has a knock-on effect and I want pupils to think about how a minimum wage will impact on unemployment and firm’s costs as shown below.


What is important to remember here is that I am not asking pupils to discover or guess these impacts, I have explicitly taught this. Pupils deep thinking is not guesswork but explaining how different topics we have taught link together. Daniel Willingham talks about this as being about consequences, one of the 4 C’s of storytelling.  

Differences and Similarities

The 2nd is on understanding the differences between concepts. What is the difference between how a minimum wage and increased trade union power impact the demand for labour? Also, in what circumstances will these effects be the same?

They will have been explicitly taught these concepts, but it is then understanding the differences between these that forces pupils to think deeply about the subject. There is also an element of interleaving here as pupils remember previously taught material when making these comparisons. Pupils can look back in their booklets as a scaffold if needed.  It’s worth noting a lot of this can be done through verbal questioning also, as long as cold calling is used with their name chosen after the question is posed so all pupils are thinking about the answer.

Application

Finally, I want pupils to be able to think about how this learning applies in different contexts. In Economics part of this is explaining something diagrammatically and linking their explanation of what they have learned to a diagram. It can also be a news story where pupils may see how the introduction of a minimum wage led to increased unemployment where pupils explain why it was and what characteristics about that economy resulted in this happening. 

This is not critical thinking skills as they are not being forced to make any decisions but applying their knowledge to a particular example.

So we can update our earlier model on how pupils remember:



If anyone has any views or advice on how to improve the depth of pupils thinking I would love to hear them!

Popular posts from this blog

8 Lessons from using Booklets

  Over summer (and the March lockdown) I read blogs from BenNewmark and Adam Boxer on how to create and use booklets of practice questions as opposed to power points. It has been a real game-changer for me in terms of the amount my pupils are now practising content, the mental capacity I have during a lesson to focus on how pupils and it massively reduces workload which gives teachers time to plan for their explanations and questioning. The blogs linked above explain the advantages of using them far better than me, but I wanted to speak about the process of creating and using them for me. It has been a process of trial and error for me this year and some of the key lessons learned are: 1.        It is incredible CPD for your subject knowledge I underestimated how much creating booklets enhanced my subject knowledge. I thought I understood by subject well but when you create these booklets, you specify exactly the knowledge you want pupils to know to write questions about them

The benefits of making pupils respond verbally in full sentences

 Since returning for Easter, one change I’ve been making is to insist that pupils answer questions in full sentences. I saw this on a Tweet from Lee Donaghy and Doug Lemov speaks about the ‘art of the sentence’ in Teach Like a Champion. In essence, the idea is that the more pupils practice speaking in a full sentence, the more able they will be to articulate their thoughts and improve their writing. It also highlights if pupils really understand what is being asked. A mumbled answer can mask a misunderstanding that whereas a full sentence often can’t as it requires a fuller explanation. One thing I have noticed is that even though the instruction is simply to answer in a full sentence, the outcome is that pupils expand the point they are making. In only a few weeks I’ve seen an improvement in both the amount pupils are writing as well as the quality of their essays. There are 4 points that I think are worth considering if you are trying to implement this in your own classroom:

first thoughts on devising an economics curriculum

  I’ve kept slightly detached from some of the discussions around curriculum that I’ve seen on blogs and CPD sessions in the last 18 months or so. This is partly because I’ve found it slightly too abstract and also that teaching Economics, I don’t have pupils for as long as most subjects so cannot devise a y 7-11 curriculum and have far less choice about what to teach. Having said that, I have recently read Kat Howard and Claire Hill’s book ‘Symbiosis’ and 'Gallimaufray to Coherence' by Mary Myatt which has inspired me to rethink how I consider the curriculum. In particular for KS4. My school start key stage 4 in year 9 so I have pupils for 3 years for their Economics GCSE. Previously I have worked sequentially through the specification but pupils ‘symbiosis’ has got me thinking about what the golden threads are that link the subject together and what the big ideas are that I want pupils to consider and how they can build on this through their 3 years of study. Before I d