Skip to main content

Teaching the Price Mechanism

 A topic in Micro I have always struggled to teach is the price mechanism. It's a bit embarrassing to admit this given it is the foundation of all market economics but I often find that whilst pupils can understand the concept of an equilibrium and how an equilibrium can change, exactly why the price mechanism leads to an efficient allocation of resources can appear quite nebulous.

This year, I have tried to break down what the component parts of this to sequence it more effectively and what I have got to is:

1. What is the economic problem

2. What is the impact of a change in prices on Demand/ what causes a shift in Demand

3. How do prices respond to excess demand or supply?

4. How does this lead to a new equilibrium?

5. What are the functions of the price mechanism that cause a new equilibrium?

6. How does this lead to an efficient allocation of resources?

7. How does this link back to the economic problem?

The first 4 question are relatively easy to understand when explained explicitly but it is the final 3 parts where I find that students can struggle. This year, I have tried to integrate this more into explanations of demand and supply to make these links easier to understand.

One way I do this is to try and label and explain the price mechanism within a diagram. I've recently been reading Ollie Lovell's excellent guide to cognitive load theory and he speaks about the split-attention affect where pupils having to look between a diagram and a separate explanation of that diagram can increase the extraneous cognitive load of a student.

This year instead I use an adapted version of the diagram below so I can take what they have already leaned (how shifts in demand and supply lead to a new equilibrium) and insert the terminology of the price mechanism so they understand how they relate:


I then ensure lots of deliberate practice of this with instant feedback. I've created a simple a3 sheet pupils fill in to explain for each shift in demand or supply if there is initially excess supply or demand, how that impacts price and then to show how different elements of the price mechanism impact this within a diagram.

Following on from this, I then set a lot of drill questions so pupils can discriminate between the functions of the price mechanism. There is a nice concrete example that Tim Harford uses about a coffee shop which explains the signalling function to coffee bean farmers, polystyrene cup manufacturers etc which I think helps differentiate between the incentive and signalling functions. I find questions explaining the difference between these functions really helps explore the boundary concepts of the price mechanism.

Using booklets this year filled with drill questions has definitely had an impact on making these concepts clearer with pupils as they get so much more feedback than they have ever had before.

In order to fully understand the link between this and an efficient allocation of resources, first I now explicitly define what this means. I blogged recently on a use of a visualiser to model clear definitions which I think helps. The way I explained the concept this year was to use a non-example (or the 'difference principle' in Adam Boxer's book on explicit instruction) so I discussed a case study of a Soviet Famine to show how excess demand can persist in the absence of a price mechanism which I think made this far clearer.

It still isn't perfect but I think I'm getting closer at explaining the concept properly!

Popular posts from this blog

8 Lessons from using Booklets

  Over summer (and the March lockdown) I read blogs from BenNewmark and Adam Boxer on how to create and use booklets of practice questions as opposed to power points. It has been a real game-changer for me in terms of the amount my pupils are now practising content, the mental capacity I have during a lesson to focus on how pupils and it massively reduces workload which gives teachers time to plan for their explanations and questioning. The blogs linked above explain the advantages of using them far better than me, but I wanted to speak about the process of creating and using them for me. It has been a process of trial and error for me this year and some of the key lessons learned are: 1.        It is incredible CPD for your subject knowledge I underestimated how much creating booklets enhanced my subject knowledge. I thought I understood by subject well but when you create these booklets, you specify exactly the knowledge you want pupils to ...

first thoughts on devising an economics curriculum

  I’ve kept slightly detached from some of the discussions around curriculum that I’ve seen on blogs and CPD sessions in the last 18 months or so. This is partly because I’ve found it slightly too abstract and also that teaching Economics, I don’t have pupils for as long as most subjects so cannot devise a y 7-11 curriculum and have far less choice about what to teach. Having said that, I have recently read Kat Howard and Claire Hill’s book ‘Symbiosis’ and 'Gallimaufray to Coherence' by Mary Myatt which has inspired me to rethink how I consider the curriculum. In particular for KS4. My school start key stage 4 in year 9 so I have pupils for 3 years for their Economics GCSE. Previously I have worked sequentially through the specification but pupils ‘symbiosis’ has got me thinking about what the golden threads are that link the subject together and what the big ideas are that I want pupils to consider and how they can build on this through their 3 years of study. Before I d...

The benefits of making pupils respond verbally in full sentences

 Since returning for Easter, one change I’ve been making is to insist that pupils answer questions in full sentences. I saw this on a Tweet from Lee Donaghy and Doug Lemov speaks about the ‘art of the sentence’ in Teach Like a Champion. In essence, the idea is that the more pupils practice speaking in a full sentence, the more able they will be to articulate their thoughts and improve their writing. It also highlights if pupils really understand what is being asked. A mumbled answer can mask a misunderstanding that whereas a full sentence often can’t as it requires a fuller explanation. One thing I have noticed is that even though the instruction is simply to answer in a full sentence, the outcome is that pupils expand the point they are making. In only a few weeks I’ve seen an improvement in both the amount pupils are writing as well as the quality of their essays. There are 4 points that I think are worth considering if you are trying to implement this in your own classroom...