Skip to main content

Retrieval Practice: how to choose what pupils should retrieve?


There has been much more understanding around the importance of retrieval practice to strengthen the durability of knowledge in pupils long term memory but whilst a lot of books and blogs have discussed how to ember retrieval practice (be it  allow stakes quiz, self quizzing, flashcards etc) what I have found the most interesting as I’ve tried to embed this into my practice is considering what to retrieve.

In a sense there is no bad knowledge to retrieve. In a well-designed curriculum, everything we teach should have significance and we want pupils to remember all of it but some knowledge is more equal than others when it comes to retrieval.

Like many teachers (and a la Rosenshine) I start every lesson with 5 or 6 questions about prior learning that pupils complete with no notes. Initially, the topics these questions would be based on would be random but following some trial and error I now consider 3 areas when deciding what topics to base my retrieval on:

1. Prerequisite Knowledge

If I am going to teach indirect taxes to solve market failures, I need pupils to have a strong understanding of negative production externalities and how increases in costs of production impact supply curves. Given this, some retrieval questions will inevitably be around this.

Basing retrieval on this (with feedback then given) will enable pupils to access new learning. If this knowledge is more secure in their long-term memory, pupils can devote their working memory purely to the new information I am about to teach them. They already understand higher costs leads to an inward shift of supply and what the market failure caused by negative externalities are, so now all they will be thinking about is how an indirect tax can fix this, thus avoiding cognitive overload.

When circulating, if pupils are struggling with this, then it is an opportunity to re-teach when going through feedback. This is also of benefit to those pupils who were absent when that topic was covered so that everyone can access new content. Circulating when this retrieval is going on will also give you data about which pupils you will need to support more as you introduce new information and guide pupils towards independent work.

2. Spaced or Distributed Learning

Some of my questions will have nothing to do with what they are about to learn. Instead, I will consider 2 things, how often have they retrieved this information and how long has it been since it was last retrieved.

There is nothing new in the idea of ‘forgetting curves’ (Ebbinghaus discussed it in 1885!) but the simple idea is that for pupils to be able to keep and then retrieve information in their long term memory they ned to retrieve information multiple times over a prolonged period of time.

If I taught the concept of cross elasticity of demand 3 months ago, I then ask them to retrieve it again as enough time has passed that they are likely to start forgetting. Ideally you want retrieval to be spaced to the point where they retrieve it again just before they forget the information, so it is of maximum difficulty while still doable.

Of course, we don’t know when they are just about to forget and can’t be overly scientific about these things so I just consider how long it has been since this information was last retrieved rather than spending too much time calculating a formula of exact times since last retrievals.

But it is not just the gaps in between retrieval that needs to be considered, it is also how often it needs to be retrieved. One of the first concepts I teach at A Level is opportunity cost. If over a year it has been retrieved 5 times, is that worth then continuously retrieving again? It can be included in self quizzing that pupils complete independently but there reaches a point where knowledge is secure in long term memory.

So, it is both the time since knowledge has been retrieved and the frequency of that retrieval I consider when setting retrieval questions to ensure spaced learning but there is one important exception to that rule.

3. Automated Knowledge

There is some knowledge that is so fundamental to pupils understanding of a wide curriculum that they don’t just need to know it but it needs to become automatic. At GCSE level, pupils need to understand the concept of market equilibriums and how shifts in supply and demand impact these.
They are going to have to use this knowledge to explain changes in the equilibrium for product, labour, capital, and money markets throughout their 2 years. This means it’s not enough that they can retrieve information they need to do it automatically as though I am asking them their name.

What I do is consider for each specification I teach what are those key threshold concepts that pupils must have an automated knowledge of and questions around these feature prominently in my retrieval, even if pupils can answer them confidently. 

These are the areas where we don’t practice until we get it right, we practice until we can’t get it wrong!

Popular posts from this blog

8 Lessons from using Booklets

  Over summer (and the March lockdown) I read blogs from BenNewmark and Adam Boxer on how to create and use booklets of practice questions as opposed to power points. It has been a real game-changer for me in terms of the amount my pupils are now practising content, the mental capacity I have during a lesson to focus on how pupils and it massively reduces workload which gives teachers time to plan for their explanations and questioning. The blogs linked above explain the advantages of using them far better than me, but I wanted to speak about the process of creating and using them for me. It has been a process of trial and error for me this year and some of the key lessons learned are: 1.        It is incredible CPD for your subject knowledge I underestimated how much creating booklets enhanced my subject knowledge. I thought I understood by subject well but when you create these booklets, you specify exactly the knowledge you want pupils to know to write questions about them

The benefits of making pupils respond verbally in full sentences

 Since returning for Easter, one change I’ve been making is to insist that pupils answer questions in full sentences. I saw this on a Tweet from Lee Donaghy and Doug Lemov speaks about the ‘art of the sentence’ in Teach Like a Champion. In essence, the idea is that the more pupils practice speaking in a full sentence, the more able they will be to articulate their thoughts and improve their writing. It also highlights if pupils really understand what is being asked. A mumbled answer can mask a misunderstanding that whereas a full sentence often can’t as it requires a fuller explanation. One thing I have noticed is that even though the instruction is simply to answer in a full sentence, the outcome is that pupils expand the point they are making. In only a few weeks I’ve seen an improvement in both the amount pupils are writing as well as the quality of their essays. There are 4 points that I think are worth considering if you are trying to implement this in your own classroom:

first thoughts on devising an economics curriculum

  I’ve kept slightly detached from some of the discussions around curriculum that I’ve seen on blogs and CPD sessions in the last 18 months or so. This is partly because I’ve found it slightly too abstract and also that teaching Economics, I don’t have pupils for as long as most subjects so cannot devise a y 7-11 curriculum and have far less choice about what to teach. Having said that, I have recently read Kat Howard and Claire Hill’s book ‘Symbiosis’ and 'Gallimaufray to Coherence' by Mary Myatt which has inspired me to rethink how I consider the curriculum. In particular for KS4. My school start key stage 4 in year 9 so I have pupils for 3 years for their Economics GCSE. Previously I have worked sequentially through the specification but pupils ‘symbiosis’ has got me thinking about what the golden threads are that link the subject together and what the big ideas are that I want pupils to consider and how they can build on this through their 3 years of study. Before I d